<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 3: LinkMachine, Google Website Optimizer, and ProBlogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/</link>
	<description>How to Quit Your Job and Start Your Own Business</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brian,

I figured that was probably the only way to do it.  I think I am going to wait until WP 2.5 is finally released and see if one of the WP directory plugin authors will update their plugins, since all of the ones I have found "broke" with WP 3.2.

Tracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brian,</p>
<p>I figured that was probably the only way to do it.  I think I am going to wait until WP 2.5 is finally released and see if one of the WP directory plugin authors will update their plugins, since all of the ones I have found &#8220;broke&#8221; with WP 3.2.</p>
<p>Tracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>Hi Tracy,

It doesn't really integrate with wordpress.  I just installed it separately and then put a link to it in the footer called "resources" you can see it there at the bottom. 
Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tracy,</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really integrate with wordpress.  I just installed it separately and then put a link to it in the footer called &#8220;resources&#8221; you can see it there at the bottom.<br />
Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>I know this is an old post but hope you are still looking at it.  How did you integrate Linkmachine into your wordpress site?  I haven't been able to figure that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old post but hope you are still looking at it.  How did you integrate Linkmachine into your wordpress site?  I haven&#8217;t been able to figure that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Goward</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Goward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting challenge, Brian. How did your GWO test go on your book page?

Your readers might be interested in an &lt;a href="http://www.widerfunnel.com/google/interview-with-tom-leung-business-product-manager-at-google" rel="nofollow"&gt;interview we recently had with the GWO product manager, Tom Leung&lt;/a&gt;. 

We've also developed a &lt;a href="http://www.widerfunnel.com/proof/do-the-math/" rel="nofollow"&gt;simple calculator&lt;/a&gt; to determine how valuable multivariate testing services could be for your business. 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting challenge, Brian. How did your GWO test go on your book page?</p>
<p>Your readers might be interested in an <a href="http://www.widerfunnel.com/google/interview-with-tom-leung-business-product-manager-at-google" rel="nofollow">interview we recently had with the GWO product manager, Tom Leung</a>. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve also developed a <a href="http://www.widerfunnel.com/proof/do-the-math/" rel="nofollow">simple calculator</a> to determine how valuable multivariate testing services could be for your business. </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Good point.  I've heard that as well that reciprocal links are declining in importance, but I've also heard the opposite that good reciprocal links are enough to achieve top 10 rankings.  I decided that as long as they were relevant links (as you pointed out that was important) it couldn't hurt, and would most likely help even if it was only a little.  One resource I've found invluable when learning about SEO is http://www.warriorforum.com

Thanks!
Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Good point.  I&#8217;ve heard that as well that reciprocal links are declining in importance, but I&#8217;ve also heard the opposite that good reciprocal links are enough to achieve top 10 rankings.  I decided that as long as they were relevant links (as you pointed out that was important) it couldn&#8217;t hurt, and would most likely help even if it was only a little.  One resource I&#8217;ve found invluable when learning about SEO is <a href="http://www.warriorforum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.warriorforum.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon West</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/46/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/2007/06/19/day-3-linkmachine-google-website-optimizer-and-problogger/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Howdy,

I just wanted to comment on the part about LinkMachine.  Reciprocal links have very little importance nowadays and you can/will get penalized by linking out to a lot of websites that are (probably) not very well established.  Even getting a lot of reciprocal PR4 links will not help a website rank in a remotely competitive market.  The best thing to do is get one-way links with relevant anchor text.  Aside from that, three-way links work better than two-way.  

I hope this is helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy,</p>
<p>I just wanted to comment on the part about LinkMachine.  Reciprocal links have very little importance nowadays and you can/will get penalized by linking out to a lot of websites that are (probably) not very well established.  Even getting a lot of reciprocal PR4 links will not help a website rank in a remotely competitive market.  The best thing to do is get one-way links with relevant anchor text.  Aside from that, three-way links work better than two-way.  </p>
<p>I hope this is helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
