<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Tell What’s Bullshit And What’s True &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/</link>
	<description>Experiments in tech entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s been my experience too.  I remember seeing the George Bush page defaced one time where people had posted a bunch of junk, but I hit refresh about 5 seconds later and it was back to what it should be.  Their community is great about patrolling stuff like that which I think is the real power of wikipedia.  Supposedly, the founder of wikipedia used to give talks where he would deface a page at the beginning of the talk and by the end it had always been fixed by the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s been my experience too.  I remember seeing the George Bush page defaced one time where people had posted a bunch of junk, but I hit refresh about 5 seconds later and it was back to what it should be.  Their community is great about patrolling stuff like that which I think is the real power of wikipedia.  Supposedly, the founder of wikipedia used to give talks where he would deface a page at the beginning of the talk and by the end it had always been fixed by the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... maybe it&#039;s not so easy as I imagined to find BS articles these days.  I was looking for a number of articles which were obvious BS (like the one on Marco Polo when I checked before) but they seem to have been replaced with something sensible since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; maybe it&#8217;s not so easy as I imagined to find BS articles these days.  I was looking for a number of articles which were obvious BS (like the one on Marco Polo when I checked before) but they seem to have been replaced with something sensible since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Interesting...that may be true, although I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve seen one yet.  If you have any examples would love to take a look.  My guess is that the BS ones get edited really quickly, but that is just a guess.  Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;that may be true, although I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve seen one yet.  If you have any examples would love to take a look.  My guess is that the BS ones get edited really quickly, but that is just a guess.  Thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>&quot;The best resource I’ve found for quick, unbiased fact finding is honestly Wikipedia.&quot;

I can&#039;t agree there.  Although some pages are definitely excellent (obviously prepared by people who definitely know what they&#039;re talking about - and I can say that because I work in the same field), it doesn&#039;t take much work to find pages that are 100% BS.

Now on Wikipedia, how do we separate the truth from the BS? Unfortunately at this stage in time I would not consider Wikipedia as a reliable source.  Then again I don&#039;t consider publications like the Encyclopedia Britannica as terribly reliable either, but in most cases I think it is better than the Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The best resource I’ve found for quick, unbiased fact finding is honestly Wikipedia.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t agree there.  Although some pages are definitely excellent (obviously prepared by people who definitely know what they&#8217;re talking about &#8211; and I can say that because I work in the same field), it doesn&#8217;t take much work to find pages that are 100% BS.</p>
<p>Now on Wikipedia, how do we separate the truth from the BS? Unfortunately at this stage in time I would not consider Wikipedia as a reliable source.  Then again I don&#8217;t consider publications like the Encyclopedia Britannica as terribly reliable either, but in most cases I think it is better than the Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Tell What&#8217;s Bullshit And What&#8217;s True - Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Tell What&#8217;s Bullshit And What&#8217;s True - Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Here is a link to part 2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Here is a link to part 2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>Definitely.  Have you read The Psychology of Influence?  It&#039;s a classic on marketing, how people make decisions, etc.  Highly recommended!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely.  Have you read The Psychology of Influence?  It&#8217;s a classic on marketing, how people make decisions, etc.  Highly recommended!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good Point Glenn.  Some things just feel good/bad right/wrong etc and the scientific method isn&#039;t a good fit there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good Point Glenn.  Some things just feel good/bad right/wrong etc and the scientific method isn&#8217;t a good fit there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Recently I&#039;ve read Dan Ariely&#039;s book Predictably Irrational. It is a very well researched book that tackles why people make decisions - as the title says, we very often make decisions on irrational grounds, but in predictable ways.
As a marketer, I am very interested in what influences people - in many cases, people don&#039;t let the facts get in the way of a good story :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve read Dan Ariely&#8217;s book Predictably Irrational. It is a very well researched book that tackles why people make decisions &#8211; as the title says, we very often make decisions on irrational grounds, but in predictable ways.<br />
As a marketer, I am very interested in what influences people &#8211; in many cases, people don&#8217;t let the facts get in the way of a good story :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>Brian,
I agree with the general point of your article. I have an entire section in a research report on cholesterol I wrote that addresses the lack of critical reasoning skills among average people today.

However, I always make the distinction when discussing the scientific method that it is a good tool for examining things that are measurable. Many things in the world are demonstrably &quot;true&quot; but are not measurable and therefore the scientific method is not a good tool for understanding them (love, pain,creativity, many others).

Regards,
Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
I agree with the general point of your article. I have an entire section in a research report on cholesterol I wrote that addresses the lack of critical reasoning skills among average people today.</p>
<p>However, I always make the distinction when discussing the scientific method that it is a good tool for examining things that are measurable. Many things in the world are demonstrably &#8220;true&#8221; but are not measurable and therefore the scientific method is not a good tool for understanding them (love, pain,creativity, many others).</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.startbreakingfree.com/512/how-to-tell-what%e2%80%99s-bullshit-and-what%e2%80%99s-true-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startbreakingfree.com/?p=512#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Got it fixed, thanks!  Of course, using the word &quot;bullshit&quot; about 5 times in one article probably wasn&#039;t very grammatically correct either, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it fixed, thanks!  Of course, using the word &#8220;bullshit&#8221; about 5 times in one article probably wasn&#8217;t very grammatically correct either, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

